12/29/05
White County News-Telegraph
Stop I-3 partners with
green group: I-3 opponents can make tax-free donations
12/19/05
Athens Banner-Herald
I-3
opponents too late to fight for mountains
11/14/05
Newsweek
Once
Unique, Soon a Place Like Any Other
11/9/05
Smoky Mountain Sentinel
Commissioners:
Ive learned more, Im not for (Interstate
3).
11/04/05, Greenwire
Epic battle looms over
coast-to-mountains highway proposal
11/2/05
Creative Loafing
Road
Rage
10/27/05
The Gainesville Times
Critics:
New interstate a waste of funds
10/4/05
NPR's "Morning Edition"
Mountain
Interstate Plans Raise Alarm
10 or 11, 2005
The Cherokee Scout
Two editorials:
I-3 not right for our area
Don't get fooled by the rhetoric
9/14/05
Smoky Mountain News
I-3
planning process shrouded in ambiguity
9/12/05
AccessNorthGa.com
Stop
I-3 Coalition says Congress should use funds for Katrina relief
9/8/05
White County News-Telegraph
'Boondoggle'
9/7/05
St Petersburg Times
From
disaster to disgrace
9/6/05
WSB-TV, Channel 2
Partial transcript of interview
re Interstate 3
9/2/05
Savannah Morning News
Detour
highway bill
9/2/05
Towns County Sentinel
"STOP I-3" presented
to Rotarians
8/31/05
Georgia ForestWatch
Our back yards must get
bigger if the Stop I-3 fight is to succeed
8/29/05
The New York Times
Destroying
the National Parks
8/28/05
The Gainesville Times
I-3
should not be built just to carry nuclear materials
8/28/05
White County News-Telegraph
Interstate 3 opponents ask
why
8/26/05
White County News-Telegraph
Our
View
8/24/05
The Gainesville Times
Chambliss takes no stance
on mountain interstate
8/24/05
The Gainesville Times
I-3 opponents say politicians
invited to rally, but most didn't show
8/23/05
The Toccoa Record
Norwood
holds closed meeting
8/22/05
Atlanta Journal Constitution
Opposition
lines road to proposed interstates
8/12/05
The Northeast Georgian
Norwood says no I-3
route being considered
8/11/05
The Clayton Tribune
Norwood: Wait and see on I-3
8/10/05
Asheville Citizen-Times
Not
so fast on this whole I-3 thing
8/8/05
Asheville Citizen-Times
Interstate
3 study stirs WNC protest - Residents organize to fight road
plan
8/7/05
The Gainesville Times
Plans
for interstate again threaten our mountains' beauty
8/5/05
The Northeast Georgian
Highway bill to help fund Cornelia corridor
widening
8/5/05
The Knoxville News Sentinel
Williams:
Stand against destructive
I-3
8/4/05
White County News - Telegraph
White County Commission rejects
I-3 plan
7/31/05
Gwinnett Daily Post
New
interstate through the South has growing opposition
7/31/05
St. Petersburg Times
Interstate
is to mountains what drilling is to the gulf
7/30/05
WMAC-AM
Plan
For New SE Interstate Meetings With Opposition
7/29/05
Anderson Independent-Mail
I-3 study receives funding
boost
7/27/05
Chattooga Quarterly
Editorial
by Buzz Williams
7/27/05
Chattooga Quarterly
Interstate
3
7/24/05
Athens Banner-Herald
Reactions
mixed to proposed interstates
7/23/05
Anderson Independent-Mail
I-3 study on the way to President's
desk
7/14/05
The Clayton Tribune
Commissioners: No interstate
7/13 - The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Mountains
no place for interstate
7/13/05
The Northeast Georgian
I-3: Just say 'no'
7/9/05
Rabun commissioners declare unanimous opposition to Interstate.
7/6/05
Smoky Mountain News
6/28/05
The Northeast Georgian
Stop I-3 Coalition encourages writing letters
to congressmen
6/24/05
The Northeast Georgian
Commission says 'no' to I-3
6/17/05
The Knoxville News Sentinel
Are we ready for another interstate?
6/3/05
The Northeast Georgian
Interstate 3 route study could begin soon
2/28/05
Virginia's New Economy
The Shape
of the Future: Interstate Crime
<< 2007 News Articles
<< 2006
News Articles
|
June 17, 2005
Re-published with permission from the Knoxville
News Sentinel
Are we ready for another interstate?
Knoxville is about to endure many months of construction
on Interstate 40 through downtown, along with the major frustrations
and disruption of traffic patterns that will accompany it.
Now comes news of the possibility of another interstate highway
hitting Knoxville and connecting with the Georgia coast.
Interstate 3 is more than a lofty concept. It is heavily
on the minds of a number of Georgia lawmakers who are asking
for a feasibility study of two routes: I-3 from Knoxville
to Savannah, Ga., and I-14 from Augusta, Ga., west through
Alabama to Natchez, Miss., on the Mississippi River.
A bill to create I-3 was proposed in July 2004 by Georgia
Rep. Max Burns. The designation of I-3 is to honor the 3rd
Infantry Division based at Fort Stewart, Ga., for its role
in Operation Iraqi Freedom. The proposal also has earned the
backing of Georgia's two Republican senators, Saxby Chambliss
and Johnny Isakson.
The rationale for the interstate - other than making use
of the large amount of public money that usually is available
in federal highway bills - is to balance the interstate network
in the South with other sections of the nation. When the interstate
highway system was begun in the 1950s, the South's population
was smaller, and the interstates through the South were fewer
than those in the Northeast and along the West Coast.
The population shift to the Sunbelt in recent years has reversed
that pattern in some measure, and leaders in southern states
want to take advantage of that trend. "Our population
is just going crazy," said Rep. Charlie Norwood, whose
congressional district includes northeast Georgia, through
which I-3 will pass on its way to Knoxville.
I-3 would hug the Savannah River separating Georgia and South
Carolina and travel north to Augusta, where it would intersect
the already well-traveled I-20 and the proposed I-14. Then,
I-3 would continue through northeast Georgia and into North
Carolina, where it would follow U.S. 19, 74 and 129 to the
Tennessee border.
Presumably, the route would tunnel and snake - or dragon-tail,
if it follows U.S. 129 - its way through the mountains. Then,
it would hook up with U.S. 129 through Maryville before joining
I-140 and connecting with I-40/75 in West Knoxville.
There are advantages to this route for Knoxvillians, not
the least of which is being able to completely bypass Atlanta
to get to the Georgia coast or to Florida. Even now, many
in this area find it more convenient to travel to Florida
via I-40 east and then drive I-26 through the Carolinas to
I-95.
The new interstate can help relieve traffic on the oftentimes
overcrowded I-75 and I-26, although actual construction appears
years, if not decades, away. How much relief it can provide
to the established routes by then is questionable.
On the other side, does Knoxville really need another interstate
with its heavy traffic and the potential to add air pollution
to an area already on the Environmental Protection Agency's
nonattainment list? Is there any consideration here for the
alternative of mass public transit?
The answer to the first question is a reluctant yes, the
second a disappointing no. If a new interstate heading in
this direction is to be built, local leaders are not likely
to turn down the opportunity to improve the commerce that
such projects bring to the area - jobs, businesses and industries
and people.
On the other hand, the environmental concerns are massive.
The Knoxville area is too high on too many poor air-quality
lists for any local or state leader to take those concerns
lightly: more vehicles, more fossil fuels burned, more air
pollution.
Then, there is the problem of cutting through the mountains,
despoiling the landscape, scattering animal habitats and forever
altering the scenery. The environmental impact statement on
the North Carolina and Tennessee portions alone will take
years to digest and debate.
Thus far, the impetus for this project is coming from Georgia
lawmakers. Knoxville and East Tennessee officials might want
to take note and exert some control over what is likely to
be a drawn-out process but one that could have a heavy impact
on this area.
They need to raise their questions and voice their concerns
and learn as much as they can as early as they can. Anything
less could leave this area shortchanged, economically and
environmentally.
|