stop i3, stop i-3, i3, i-3, stopinterstate3, stop interstate 3, north georgia mountains, environmental concerns, eminent	domain, commercial development, highway, construction, sprawl

Citizens Speak
Letters-to-the-Editor and Editorial Opinions from the Regional and National Press
and individuals' letters to the Stop I-3 Coalition

12/12/07, Knoxville News Sentinel
DOE incinerator down as waste concerns go up

12/7/07,
The Daily News Journal
Europe should handle its own nuclear waste

10/19/07
Atlanta Journal-Constitution
The profit-hungry in Ga. soon might thirst

9/20/07
Towns County Herald
Letter from Paul Broun, US Rep, 10th District, GA

9/11/07
Columbia County News-Times
Comments omitted sponsorship of CLEAR Act, 'could mislead' on I-3
From U.S. Rep. Paul C. Broun

8/28/07
The Northeast Georgian
Come Together Now to Stop a Potential Disaster

8/24/07
Winston-Salem Journal
Transportation Crisis

08/16/07
Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Commuter rail part of solution

6/2/07
Many reasons, one message: "Leave Our Mountains Alone!"

1/12/07
The Northeast Georgian
Highway 17 is a treasure and should be preserved

11/20/06
Metro Pulse (Knoxville)
North Shore Road, I-3 are "Nowhere"

10/11/06
Cherokee Sentinel
Interstate 3: Not dead yet

1/26/06
White County News-Telegraph
Billy Jenkins' I-3 route? Horrible

1/26/06
White County News-Telegraph
I-3 is all about ... Chinese imports?

1/26/06
White County News-Telegraph
Protests might alter I-3 route

12/20/05 - Athens Banner-Herald
Proposed Interstate 3 would hinder growth

10/17/05
The Gainesville Times
Rebuild for the residents, not political pork, profits

10/18/05
The Northeast Georgian
Time to rechannel money

10/16/05
Interstate-3: The Impact on Our Neotropical Migratory Birds

10/8/05
White County News-Telegraph
Spend some of gas tax money on economically viable projects

10/8/05
White County News-Telegraph
Do interstates really bring new business?

10/8/05
White County News-Telegraph
Save mountains for future generations to enjoy

10/4/05
The Northeast Georgian
Use I-3 money to help Gulf Coast

9/29/05
Towns County Sentinel
Letter to the Editor

9/16/05
The Northeast Georgian
Who wants proposed interstate and why?

9/7/05
White County News-Telegraph
Reasons for interstate are not justified

9/5/05
The Gainesville Times
Do not shift nuclear transit to other highways

8/22/05
Biker Outraged

7/7/05
The Clayton Tibune
Our True Wealth

7/5/05
The Northeast Georgian
Pull together to defeat I-3

6/24/05
The Northeast Georgian
Use I-3 money to address safety

6/24/05
The Northeast Georgian
Interstate will increase pollution and traffic

6/23/05
White County News-Telegraph
Stop 1-3 Before It Gets Started

6/10/05
The Northeast Georgian
I-3: Just say "no"

6/10/05
The Northeast Georgian
Interstate 3 is unneeded, unwanted

6/10/05
The Northeast Georgian
Don't let interstate rip through county

6/7/05
The Northeast Georgian
Why spoil a good thing?

Stop 1-3 Before It Gets Started

Letter to the Editor
White County News•Telegraph
Published June 23, 2005

June 19, 2005

Dear Transportation Committee members,

I’m writing to urge to eliminate the funding for the study of Interstate 3 as proposed by H.R. 3, TEA-LU. The suggested routing through northeast Georgia is incomprehensible. Mountains, mountain communities and expressways are not a good mix – environmentally, economically and esthetically.

Please take a minute to review the justifications for I-3 in the original bill. They’re a joke.
The bill invokes the original, cold war purpose of the interstate highway system to justify “linking defensive installations across the South, including Fort Gordon, Eisenhower Army Regional Medical Center, the Augusta Veterans Administration Hospitals, Fort Stewart, Hunter Army Airfield, and the Port of Savannah which is in the strategic defense interest of the Nation.” These are hardly defense installations spread out across the south. They’re all either in Savannah or Augusta GA, which are only 90 miles apart. And how would an expressway linking these installations enhance our strategic defense? Would it somehow make military convoys less vulnerable to enemy attack? What enemy? How high a priority is the defense of these installations compared with others in more highly populated areas? Maybe I’m being naïve. Maybe there is a military justification that I just can’t see. But these installations are all in east Georgia. If you have to waste our limited tax dollars on new interstate projects, let I-3 run from Savannah to Augusta and go on to hook up with I-26. The terrain and communities along such a route are much more suited for an expressway than the mountains of northeast Georgia, western North Carolina and east Tennessee.

The bill also claims that “East Georgia, Western North Carolina, and the Great Smoky Mountains region of Tennessee are underserved by north-south interstate highways, and would benefit economically and through increased public safety by establishment of an interstate highway following a route through…Young Harris." You want to put an Interstate Highway through the Great Smoky Mountain National Park??? I-3 would ruin the very essence of what makes the mountains unique. The last thing we need is the kind of economic and development patterns that follow expressway construction. We don’t need more low-paying jobs, fast food filled interchanges and cookie cutter sprawl. I predict you will see intense opposition to I-3 in every mountain community and county that has the potential to be impacted. We are going to fight this tooth and nail. Since news of the proposed highway hit our local press about a month ago, the only support has been from those who hope to profit by selling property and those who have fallen for the argument that the highway may bring major employers and manufacturing jobs that will keep our younger generation from seeking employment elsewhere. Jobs on existing interstates have migrated south of the border, so I put this hope in the “pie in the sky” category.

A final justification for building this highway is that it would honor the sacrifice of the United States Army 3rd Infantry Division, which “sacrificed their blood and lives so that their fellow Americans can live in peace and freedom. These soldiers conquered Najaf, seized Saddam International Airport and Saddam Hussein's palaces, and led the fighting on the day of Baghdad's historic liberation.” This is the most disturbing of the three reasons. What blatantly false patriotism. What pandering platitudes. Where will it end, and where will the equity be if you start building highways in honor of every division that has fought in Iraq or all the places before or to come where our children have died? If you really want to honor U.S. troops, use the I-3 study funds to speed the armor plating of all the humvees in Iraq. Use the I-3 study funds to get every GI in harm’s way the best body armor money can buy. Use the I-3 study funds to extend the health care coverage of reserve and National Guard members after they come off of active duty and return to the states. We have injured soldiers whose benefits cease when they are no longer officially on active duty. This is wrong, immoral and shameful.

Sincerely,

Sam Williams
Sautee Nacoochee, GA


HOME   |   NEWS   |   ACTION   |   RESOURCES   |   CONTACT US   |   DONATE

back to top


Hosting donated by
Netspace Ads.com